logo

LockeStreet.com is best viewed with 4+browsers
with monitors set to 800x600 or greater.

Snap Shots
ForumsChatFree E-MailFree Newsletter
Home
Street News
Community
About Locke Street
About This Site
About This Site
Contact Us
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

privacy policy

School Revitalization Process Threatens Neighbourhood

Board reveals closure scenario at Public Information Meeting

By Craig Hermanson,
LockeStreet.com Coordinator &
Earl Kitchener Parent Representative

30 April 2003: This is a great neighbourhood and it's been improving. Businesses and homes are receiving more than simple maintenance—property owners are making significant investments which are continuously improving our street-scapes. Witness the renaissance on Locke Street and new life on Dundurn if you have any doubts. Dare I ask? What about the Allenby Loft conversion to showcase the vitality of the neighbourhood? Or use another measure. Compare the cost of a haircut on Locke Street five years ago to now.

Related Links

I strongly support revitalization in our community. I'm not from here, but I choose to live here, have no intentions of moving elsewhere, will rally to protect what is great about this area and fight to improve what is not.

I have hope for the future of this neighbourhood but feel we are threatened if the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board has its way with their School Revitalization Strategy.

The agenda of the Hamilton School Board (under the leadership of Dr. Murray) is to eliminate 350 pupil positions in Hamilton West (over and above the Sanford School consolidation). The only scenario presented by the Board to the Hamilton West Area Accommodation Review Committee (on which I sit as a representative of Earl Kitchener) is to close Central and Strathcona schools and distribute these students to Earl Kitchener and Hess schools. This would increase EK's student population from 370 to 600 full time pupils and Hess to approximately 490 students. And that would mean portable classroom space for EK.

In fact, a preference was stated by Board staff for a solution which includes portable classrooms and 'portapack units' as these can fill schools above the Ministry Rated Capacity.

The goal is to show more students than there is space for so that mortgage money can be received to build new schools. And the areas identified for new schools are strictly in the suburbs of South Mountain, Ancaster, Glanbrook/Binbrook and Waterdown.

Revitalization to The School Board means new buildings in the suburbs not renewal in urban areas. In essence, use of portable space at EK and Ryerson would fund the building of a new elementary school in the Meadowlands—proposed to open in September 2005. Note: To maintain provincial grants for the mortgage on this new school, the Board would need to maintain this pupil capacity throughout the 25 year mortgage!

To support the mandate of eliminating 350 pupil spaces, The Board presented a number of charts detailing population and migration rates. To be honest, these show there HAD been a downward trend in need for pupil space in Hamilton West. But they also showed an upward bounce in recent years with births at a three year high and positive migration of school aged children since 1997.

Of particular concern,

  • The Boards assumptions IGNORE the upward movement in numbers of recent years yet predict flat future population changes.
  • The Board's assumptions IGNORE the urban renewal which is is advocated by the City and is taking place in Hamilton's South West.
  • They pay no heed to the well-documented influx of Toronto buyers and the associated fierce competition for family homes here or what this might mean in terms of enrollment.
  • The demographics provided do not explore cohorts other than newborn and school aged children, such as residents approaching/of an age consistent with child-rearing or home-downsizing age.
  • The choice to close a newer school (Strathcona was built in 1985) flies in the face of the stated purpose of revitalizing the school system.
  • Sanford is being demolished and rebuilt and the size of this school could exasperate or alleviate the excess-capacity in the system.

I have to question if this scenario has the potential to create a self-fulfilling prophecy whereby The Board's actions would stunt the growth in the south west and cause enrollment to slip. Closing a perfectly good and well maintained structure to outfit an aging and somewhat neglected school with portable structures can only act to discourage community revitalization efforts. Good schools in the public and separate boards are a major draw to this neighbourhood. Neglect here while new schools are built in the suburbs would surely affect enrollment not to mention the quality of life for all residents in our neighbourhood.

However, I have hope because I live here and know what this community is like and what the response will be like. As one parent said, "Earl Kitchener needs to be revitalized, not victimized" and we will mobilize the school community as necessary.

I need to say that this is not a Not-In-My-Back-Yard response. We're concerned with the bigger picture; for the well-being and attractiveness of public education, for the health of our urban environment, and for the sustainable growth of Hamilton in general. There are 'empty pupil spaces' in Westdale too, but what would be the result on a community where the number of homes rented to multiple University students has increased from 46% in 1996 to 49% in 1999? Complete student ghetto? Unacceptable.

We need to respond to the excess-capacity in the system, but surely we can respond more creatively to this problem than closing a perfectly good building to place our children into portable classrooms. If not, I doubt the Board's troubles with excess-capacity will be behind them. What would be the response by EK parents?

The mandate does not need to be the elimination of 350 pupil spaces, only the elimination of 350 excess-pupil spaces—and there is a huge difference between the two. Let's be open, think outside the box and move forward with positive solutions and a positive future.


More on School Closure Issues:

For more news please visit the News Index.

If you have something to say on this matter, join a discussion in our discussion forums.

LockeStreet.com welcomes your comments and suggestions. Read more about this site.
 

<top>
 

Be sure to visit the LockeStreet.com Service Directory




Home  |  Street News  |  Community  |  Service Directory  |  About Locke Street  |  About This Site  |  Contact Us

© 2003 LockeStreet.com/Craig Hermanson